CANLI
xAI, Imagine API’yi 2.0’a Yükseltmeye Hazırlanıyor: Görüntü ve Video Tek…·Microsoft MAI-Cyber-1-Flash’ı Duyurdu·Moonshot AI, Kimi K3 Model Ağırlıklarını ve Teknik Raporunu Açık…
15 Oct 2026 · 00:13 GMT+3
Ai Haber – Türkiyenin Yapay Zeka Haber Portalı
ARAşTıRMA · MAKINE ÖğRENMESI arXiv:2610.18842 13 Eki 2026 · v1

Who Improves the Robot? Toward Physical Recursive Self-Improvement

Hai Zhou, Fan Yang, Zeyi Chen, Lejun Zhang, Chenyang Fu, +25 yazar

YAYIN:13 Eki 2026 ALAN:cs.AI OKUMA:2

Özet

Robots are increasingly autonomous in task execution, yet their improvement remains largely human-driven. This study investigates Physical Recursive Self-Improvement (Physical RSI), in which physical experience guides lasting updates to both a robot's capabilities and its improvement procedure, making subsequent improvement more effective across tasks. Physical RSI faces challenges from noisy observations, continuous dynamics, costly trials, and irreversible consequences. We present an L0-L5 framework that differentiates capability-level from meta-level updates and within-task from across-task gains, reserving L5 for independently verified recursive gain. We study existing methods around harness adaptation and model training, alongside safety and control mechanisms that govern execution and successive updates. Our analysis reveals that, despite substantial progress in self-improvement, the surveyed literature does not yet demonstrate Physical RSI as defined by our framework. We identify research priorities in reliable feedback, causal attribution, safety preservation, and benchmarking, outlining a path toward robots that autonomously improve how they learn while ensuring safety. The GitHub repository for Physical RSI is available at https://github.com/SAIL-Research-Lab/Physical-RSI.

Özetle: Robots are increasingly autonomous in task execution, yet their improvement remains largely human-driven.

Özet

Robots are increasingly autonomous in task execution, yet their improvement remains largely human-driven. This study investigates Physical Recursive Self-Improvement (Physical RSI), in which physical experience guides lasting updates to both a robot's capabilities and its improvement procedure, making subsequent improvement more effective across tasks. Physical RSI faces challenges from noisy observations, continuous dynamics, costly trials, and irreversible consequences. We present an L0-L5 framework that differentiates capability-level from meta-level updates and within-task from across-task gains, reserving L5 for independently verified recursive gain. We study existing methods around harness adaptation and model training, alongside safety and control mechanisms that govern execution and successive updates. Our analysis reveals that, despite substantial progress in self-improvement, the surveyed literature does not yet demonstrate Physical RSI as defined by our framework. We identify research priorities in reliable feedback, causal attribution, safety preservation, and benchmarking, outlining a path toward robots that autonomously improve how they learn while ensuring safety. The GitHub repository for Physical RSI is available at https://github.com/SAIL-Research-Lab/Physical-RSI.

Orijinal Özet (İngilizce)

Robots are increasingly autonomous in task execution, yet their improvement remains largely human-driven. This study investigates Physical Recursive Self-Improvement (Physical RSI), in which physical experience guides lasting updates to both a robot's capabilities and its improvement procedure, making subsequent improvement more effective across tasks. Physical RSI faces challenges from noisy observations, continuous dynamics, costly trials, and irreversible consequences. We present an L0-L5 framework that differentiates capability-level from meta-level updates and within-task from across-task gains, reserving L5 for independently verified recursive gain. We study existing methods around harness adaptation and model training, alongside safety and control mechanisms that govern execution and successive updates. Our analysis reveals that, despite substantial progress in self-improvement, the surveyed literature does not yet demonstrate Physical RSI as defined by our framework. We identify research priorities in reliable feedback, causal attribution, safety preservation, and benchmarking, outlining a path toward robots that autonomously improve how they learn while ensuring safety. The GitHub repository for Physical RSI is available at https://github.com/SAIL-Research-Lab/Physical-RSI.

Kaynak: arXiv:2610.18842 · PDF

BibTeX

@article{zhou2026who,
  title   = {Who Improves the Robot? Toward Physical Recursive Self-Improvement},
  author  = {Hai Zhou and Fan Yang and Zeyi Chen and Lejun Zhang and Chenyang Fu and Jianping Li and Jiayi Zhu and Xianyang Liu and Yingxuan Yang and Lili Meng and Lu Wang and Xinyang Han and Jiankai Sun and Weirui Ye and Guanchu Wang and Wanhua Li and Ming Zhou and Boyi Li and Ming Jin and Kun Shao and Muhao Chen and Guang Chen and Lei Ma and Joey Tianyi Zhou and Costas Spanos and Xia Hu and Mac Schwager and Weinan Zhang and Qian Feng and Shangding Gu},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.18842},
  year    = {2026},
  url     = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18842}
}

Tartışma

Bu habere emoji ile tepki ver

Hizli:

Henüz yorum yok. İlk yorumu siz yapın!

Yapıcı ve saygılı yorumlar bekliyoruz. Topluluk kuralları